Eight steps toward a world free from stroke
24th October 2017
24th October 2017
The past 25 years have seen the global burden of stroke rise exponentially. With an incidence pattern that shows significant differences based on gender and ethnicity, an increasing number of strokes among younger people and disproportionate rates and impact in low-to-middle income countries, getting ahead of the curve is an urgent priority for individuals and policy makers alike. Despite our best efforts around primary stroke prevention our current approaches to prevention, screening and risk management clearly aren’t hitting the mark. So, what can we do to accelerate progress?
Despite being the second biggest killer globally, public awareness of stroke risks and how to manage them is still low. This is why the World Stroke Organization is focused on prevention this World Stroke Day. We are using the day not just to highlight what we know about stroke risk and prevention but to call for commitment to continued coordinated global and national campaigns that raise awareness of how to reduce and manage individual stroke risks. Collective action by NGOs and policy-makers, supporting public awareness campaigns that have the potential to deliver significant gains in stroke prevention.
We are clearly getting something wrong in our assessment of patient risks if 80% of strokes happen to people who, using current clinical assessment tools, would be considered to be at low absolute risk of stroke. We all have good reasons to prevent stroke and we need to encourage everyone to take their stroke risk more seriously. Telling a person they are ‘low risk’ not only gives false reassurance to clinicians and to patients, it doesn’t provide the motivation people need to make the adjustments that would help them prevent a stroke.
Uncontrolled high blood pressure increases a person's stroke risk by four to six times. Addressing high blood pressure as a contributing factor to stroke would result in a significant reduction in strokes. However, the decision on whether to treat for high blood pressure is currently based on an overall calculation of high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD), under which stroke is grouped together with other conditions such as heart attack and aortic disease, where the threshold is higher. Someone with hypertension may currently not receive blood pressure reducing treatment because their overall five-year risk of CVD is less than 15%. We need to think about this from the perspective of stroke.
Despite the fact that nearly three quarters of the global burden of stroke is attributed to lifestyle factors, with the exception of smoking, current stroke screening tools don’t include a number of key lifestyle factors. We need to improve our screening tools to include behavioral risk factors such as poor diet, obesity, physical activity levels and alcohol intake.
Globally and within countries our populations are increasingly diverse. But the models we use to predict levels of risk are largely based on the Framingham study the subjects of which were largely white, North Americans. Addressing the significant differences in stroke rates across ethnicities and gender both within and between countries is going to require tools that can better predict stroke risks for specific populations so that these can be more effectively managed.
The cost of seeing a doctor for CVD assessment, lab tests and medications that may reduce stroke risk can be a significant barrier for individuals who lack financial means in high, low and middle-income countries. Low cost risk assessments and management strategies are essential. Mobile technologies offer promising, accessible, motivational, educational and validated stroke prevention tools for both patients and healthcare workers that we need to explore and develop.
Despite clear evidence of the effectiveness of population wide strategies, there is still not a single country in the world that has implemented these in full on a population level. Taxation of tobacco, sugar and alcohol would not only address incidence of stroke they would provide revenue to support research, development and implementation of culturally appropriate approaches to primary prevention.
If we are going to achieve the kind of changes and interventions that are needed to drive positive behaviors, we need to build partnerships between healthcare, and government and provide the evidence to support stronger advocacy from NGOs.
This blog is based on an article by Prof Valery Feigin published in Volume 12 Issue 1 of the International Journal of Stroke. Professor Feign is Director of AUT’s National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neuroscience (NISAN) and a World Stroke Organization (@WorldStrokeOrg) Board Member.